Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of time in therapeutic range TTR on long-term outcomes of living kidney transplants.Methods: We included 1,241 living kidney transplants and randomized them into development and validation cohorts with a ratio of 2:1. The tacrolimus TTR percentage was calculated by linear interpolation with a target range (5–10 ng/ml months 0–3, 4–8 ng/ml months 4–12). The optimal TTR cutoff was estimated by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the basis of acute rejection (AR) within 12 months in the development cohort. Outcomes were analyzed between patients with high TTR and low TTR in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The TTR was also compared with other tacrolimus measures.Results: The optimal TTR cutoff value was 78%. In the development cohort, patients with TTR > 78% had significantly higher rejection- and infection-free survival. TTR < 78% was an independent risk factor for AR (OR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.82–4.84) and infection (OR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.08–2.22). Patient and graft survival were significantly higher in those with TTR>78%, and TTR<78% was associated with graft loss (OR: 3.2, 95%CI: 1.38–7.42) and patient death (OR: 6.54, 95%CI: 1.34–31.77). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. Furthermore, we divided all included patients into a high and low TTR group. TTR was more strongly associated with patient and graft survival than mean level, standard deviation, and intrapatient variability (IPV).Conclusions: Increasing the TTR of tacrolimus in the first year was associated with improved long-term outcomes in living kidney transplants, and TTR may be a novel valuable strategy to monitor tacrolimus exposure.

Highlights

  • Tacrolimus-based regimens are the most commonly used immunosuppressive therapies, preventing T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation [1]; a narrow therapeutic index limited their clinical application

  • We found that a therapeutic range (TTR) above 78% was associated with improved graft survival and with reduced risk of acute rejection (AR) and infection

  • Tacrolimus TTR was more strongly associated with patient and graft survival than mean level, standard deviation (SD), and intrapatient variability (IPV)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tacrolimus-based regimens are the most commonly used immunosuppressive therapies, preventing T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation [1]; a narrow therapeutic index limited their clinical application. Intrapatient variability (IPV), and variability of the standard deviation of the tacrolimus trough level are associated with acute rejection (AR) and graft loss [4,5,6]. These indexes did not consider whether the tacrolimus trough level achieved a target therapeutic window and exposure time. As failure to maintain the tacrolimus trough level in target ranges is a risk factor for inferior short- and long-term outcomes [7, 8], it seems more practical and clinically relevant to develop a new indicator to combine the tacrolimus trough level with variation and the corresponding maintaining time. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of time in therapeutic range TTR on long-term outcomes of living kidney transplants

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call