Abstract
The content of the article is devoted to the scientific basis for increasing the share of the agricultural economy in GDP. In this regard, proposals are being made to increase the factors affecting the efficiency of agriculture. By increasing agricultural efficiency, we will be able to increase GDP and provide employment for the country’s workforce. In this way, we will improve the living standards of the population, that is, increase the income of the population through self-employment. The main purpose is to make proposals for the construction of agriculture based on innovative technologies based on modern technologies. That is, we can achieve GDP growth in the country through the use of intensive methods.
Highlights
Take-off from the “Two Cultures” SplitThe traditional, rather sharp separation between and by disciplines is not anymore to be upheld, if not just for operative, methodological or methodical reasons
Psychology discovered that visual conception and sense perception in general, and conceptual and common sense or naive theoretical cognition would operate in terms of the developing and applying schemata, i.e., any cognitions, interpretations, knowledge whatsoever are bound to the application, selection and activation as well as checking of schemes
It is important to note that scheme-interpretation admits of levels of categorisation according to the variability of the respective schemata, i.e., whether or not they are hereditarily fixed or conventionalized or flexible, whether they are subconsciously developed and activated or consciously conceived and used. It is only an almost necessary consequence to design a hierarchy of levels of interpretation consisting according to my proposal of six different levels or plains of interpretation listed up in the diagram: Types and Levels of interpretation Hans Lenk, TAJIIR [Volume- I Issue- VI] August 2019 [www.usajournalshub.com]
Summary
The traditional, rather sharp separation between and by disciplines is not anymore to be upheld, if not just for operative, methodological or methodical reasons. This certainly leads to respective challenges on the side of scientific methodologists on the one hand, and of social scientists, social philosophers, and moral philosophers on the other. We all know the problems resulting from the handling of documentation systems, the retrievability of data, the almost unlimited possibility of combining data with respect to data protection problems, respective legislations etc. Some even fear that we are on the brink of or already living in a “computerocracy” – being the fate and development of mass societies which
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
