Increasing the National Impact and Uptake of Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention (GPP): Three Country Case Studies

Abstract

AIDS Research and Human RetrovirusesVol. 30, No. S1 Good Participatory Practices and Community InvolvementIncreasing the National Impact and Uptake of Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention (GPP): Three Country Case StudiesStacey Hannah, Julius Ecuru, Udom Likhitwonnawut, Catherine Slack, and Ntando YolaStacey HannahAVAC, New York, NY, United StatesSearch for more papers by this author, Julius EcuruUganda National Council of Science and Technology, Kampala, UgandaSearch for more papers by this author, Udom LikhitwonnawutThai NGO Coalition on AIDS, Chiang Mai, ThailandSearch for more papers by this author, Catherine SlackHIV AIDS Vaccines Ethics Group, Pietermaritzburg, South AfricaSearch for more papers by this author, and Ntando YolaDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation, Cape Town, South AfricaSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:30 Oct 2014https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2014.5199.abstractAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View article"Increasing the National Impact and Uptake of Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention (GPP): Three Country Case Studies." AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 30(S1), p. A106FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 30Issue S1Oct 2014 InformationCopyright 2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Stacey Hannah, Julius Ecuru, Udom Likhitwonnawut, Catherine Slack, and Ntando Yola.Increasing the National Impact and Uptake of Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention (GPP): Three Country Case Studies.AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses.Oct 2014.A106-A106.http://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2014.5199.abstractPublished in Volume: 30 Issue S1: October 30, 2014PDF download