Abstract

Rain gardens have become a widespread stormwater practice in the United States, and their use is poised to continue expanding as they are an aesthetically pleasing way to improve the quality of stormwater runoff. The terms rain garden and bioretention, are now often used interchangeably to denote a landscape area that treats stormwater runoff. Rain gardens are an effective, attractive, and sustainable stormwater management solution for residential areas and urban green spaces. They can restore the hydrologic function of urban landscapes and capture stormwater runoff pollutants, such as phosphorus (P), a main pollutant in urban cities and residential neighborhoods. Although design considerations such as size, substrate depth, substrate type, and stormwater holding time have been rigorously tested, little research has been conducted on the living portion of rain gardens. This paper reviews two studies—one that evaluated the effects of flooding and drought tolerance on the physiological responses of native plant species recommended for use in rain gardens, and another that evaluated P removal in monoculture and polyculture rain garden plantings. In the second study, plants and substrate were evaluated for their ability to retain P, a typical water pollutant. Although plant growth across species was sometimes lower when exposed to repeated flooding, plant visual quality was generally not compromised. Although plant selection was limited to species native to the southeastern U.S., some findings may be translated regardless of region. Plant tissue P was higher than either leachate or substrate, indicating the critical role plants play in P accumulation and removal. Additionally, polyculture plantings had the lowest leachate P, suggesting a polyculture planting may be more effective in preventing excess P from entering waterways from bioretention gardens. The findings included that, although monoculture plantings are common in bioretention gardens, polyculture plantings can improve biodiversity, ecosystem resilience, and rain garden functionality.

Highlights

  • The negative impacts of urbanization on associated watersheds result in changes to hydrology, elevated concentrations of nutrients and contaminants, altered channel morphology, and reduced biodiversity [1]

  • Two of the six flooded P. acrostichoides plants died, and SI, LCC, and SC were lower in flooded plants than in non-flooded plants of this species in the summer 2015 run

  • In order to provide a diverse list of research-based rain garden plant recommendations to meet varying needs and tastes, the Morash (2016) [62] and Meder (2013) [61] studies utilized plants from the following functional groups: Herbaceous perennial (C. verticillata), shrubs (I. vomitoria, M. cerifera and I. floridanum), ferns (P. acrostichoides and O. cinnamomea), and grasses (A. ternarius and C. latifolium)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The negative impacts of urbanization on associated watersheds result in changes to hydrology, elevated concentrations of nutrients and contaminants, altered channel morphology, and reduced biodiversity [1]. Urbanization decreases groundwater recharge, which often leads to diminished groundwater supply [2]. Contributors to altered watersheds and reduced groundwater reserves are numerous, but the primary driver is stormwater runoff. Stormwater carries pollutants and discharges them to surface waters. Pollutants include: Heavy metals (such as lead, zinc, copper, and cadmium), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, soluble salts, pesticides, nitrogen, solids, pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and P. Phosphorus, a main pollutant in urban areas, enters waterways with surface water runoff degrading the waterways through over production of algae and aquatic plant growth [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The main source of urban P is residential lawns and streets

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call