Abstract

Prion formation involves the conversion of proteins from a soluble form into an infectious amyloid form. Most yeast prion proteins contain glutamine/asparagine-rich regions that are responsible for prion aggregation. Prion formation by these domains is driven primarily by amino acid composition, not primary sequence, yet there is a surprising disconnect between the amino acids thought to have the highest aggregation propensity and those that are actually found in yeast prion domains. Specifically, a recent mutagenic screen suggested that both aromatic and non-aromatic hydrophobic residues strongly promote prion formation. However, while aromatic residues are common in yeast prion domains, non-aromatic hydrophobic residues are strongly under-represented. Here, we directly test the effects of hydrophobic and aromatic residues on prion formation. Remarkably, we found that insertion of as few as two hydrophobic residues resulted in a multiple orders-of-magnitude increase in prion formation, and significant acceleration of in vitro amyloid formation. Thus, insertion or deletion of hydrophobic residues provides a simple tool to control the prion activity of a protein. These data, combined with bioinformatics analysis, suggest a limit on the number of strongly prion-promoting residues tolerated in glutamine/asparagine-rich domains. This limit may explain the under-representation of non-aromatic hydrophobic residues in yeast prion domains. Prion activity requires not only that a protein be able to form prion fibers, but also that these fibers be cleaved to generate new independently-segregating aggregates to offset dilution by cell division. Recent studies suggest that aromatic residues, but not non-aromatic hydrophobic residues, support the fiber cleavage step. Therefore, we propose that while both aromatic and non-aromatic hydrophobic residues promote prion formation, aromatic residues are favored in yeast prion domains because they serve a dual function, promoting both prion formation and chaperone-dependent prion propagation.

Highlights

  • Prions are protein-based infectious agents, caused by proteins capable of adopting an alternate, self-propagating amyloid-like structure

  • Various studies suggest that a key difference between aromatic and hydrophobic residues in the context of Q/N-rich domains is that aromatic residues facilitate the chaperone-dependent fragmentation that is required for prion maintenance [33,43]

  • To focus on the effects of hydrophobic residues on prion formation, we took advantage of the fact that the prion formation and maintenance activities of the Sup35 prion-forming domain (PFD) largely reside in separate regions of the PFD [44]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prions are protein-based infectious agents, caused by proteins capable of adopting an alternate, self-propagating amyloid-like structure. In mammals, misfolding of the prion protein PrP is responsible for the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), all of which are incurable and fatal [1]. Many other non-infectious diseases involve the aggregation of proteins into amyloid deposits. A number of proteins can adopt a prion state. The filamentous fungus P. anserine carries a prion protein, Het-S [2], that acts as part of a heterokaryon incompatibility mechanism. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae carries at least nine proteins that convert to a prion state [3]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call