Abstract

Human-carnivore conflict occurs globally, particularly in regions where large carnivores predate livestock. Retaliatory killings do occur, and although predation of livestock by carnivores happens, losses from other factors such as disease or injury can be misattributed because of landowner perceptions. Game farming for both trophy hunting and eco-tourism is becoming increasingly common in South Africa, and there has been a rapid increase in the cost of game animals (in some species as much as five-fold) between 2010 and 2015. This could result in an increase in conflict between commercial game farmers and carnivores. We conducted two questionnaire surveys of farmers in 2010 and 2015 to investigate this. We asked if there had been changes in farming practices, perceived predator activity, perceived amount of livestock and commercial game losses, and actions taken towards carnivores in a South African farming community. We found no significant change in farming types in the area or losses of livestock between the years. However, there was a significant increase in perceived commercial game losses reported, even though protection of game had increased. Actions taken towards carnivores by livestock/game farmers were also significantly more negative in 2015 compared to farmers growing crops, but there was no such difference in 2010. We suggest that these changes could be a result of the increase in game prices over that period, leading to greater financial losses when an animal is predated, which in turn could increase the likelihood of retaliatory killings of carnivores.

Highlights

  • As human populations increase, human-wildlife conflict grows, when human livelihoods are negatively affected by wildlife (Thirgood, Woodroffe & Rabinowitz, 2005; Dickman, 2010)

  • Farm type was classified as crop (2010 N = 8, 2015 N = 9), livestock (2010 N = 24, 2015 N = 22) and commercial game farmers (2010 N = 3, 2015 N = 9)

  • There was a significant decrease in any form of animal protection by stock farmers, either by providing overnight camps, guarding by people or dogs, or monitoring young animals (W = 218, 2010 N = 22, 2015 N = 16, p = 0.014; Table 1); numbers were small, there was a significant increase in protection of commercial game in the form of fenced camps in 2015 (Fisher’s exact test 2010 N = 0, 2015 N = 7, p = 0.045, Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human-wildlife conflict grows, when human livelihoods are negatively affected by wildlife (Thirgood, Woodroffe & Rabinowitz, 2005; Dickman, 2010). The increased encroachment of people into wilderness areas is inevitable (Asibey, 1974; Sillero-Zubiri & Switzer, 2001) and limited resources often force wildlife into areas of pasture or arable land where conflict can occur (Sillero-Zubiri & Switzer, 2001; How to cite this article Pirie et al (2017), Increasing game prices may alter farmers’ behaviours towards leopards (Panthera pardus) and other carnivores in South Africa. Human-wildlife conflict will undoubtedly continue to be a key factor in the decline of wildlife populations, for carnivores (Woodroffe, 2000; Dickman, Glen & Letnic, 2009; Hoffman & O’Riain, 2012), unless issues can be highlighted and addressed

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call