Abstract

ConspectusIn this Account, we demonstrate an increasing complexity approach to gain insight into the principal aspects of the surface and interface chemistry and catalysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anode and electrolyte materials based on selected oxide, intermetallic, and metal–oxide systems at different levels of material complexity, as well as into the fundamental microkinetic reaction steps and intermediates at catalytically active surface and interface sites. To dismantle the complexity, we highlight our deconstructing step-by-step approach, which allows one to deduce synergistic properties of complex composite materials from the individual surface catalytic properties of the single constituents, representing the lowest complexity level: pure oxides and pure metallic materials. Upon mixing and doping the latter, directly leading to formation of intermetallic compounds/alloys in the case of metals and oxygen ion conductors/mixed ionic and electronic conductors for oxides, a second complexity level is reached. Finally, the introduction of an (inter)metall(ic)–(mixed) oxide interface leads to the third complexity level. A shell-like model featuring three levels of complexity with the unveiled surface and interface chemistry at its core evolves. As the shift to increased complexity decreases the number of different materials, the interconnections between the studied materials become more convoluted, but the resulting picture of surface chemistry becomes clearer. The materials featured in our investigations are all either already used technologically important or prospective components of SOFCs (such as yttria-stabilized zirconia, perovskites, or Ni–Cu alloys) or their basic constituents (e.g., ZrO2), or they are formed by reactions of other compounds (for instance, pyrochlores are thought to be formed at the YSZ/perovskite phase boundary). We elaborate three representative case studies based on ZrO2, Y2O3, and Y-doped ZrO2 in detail from all three complexity levels. By interconnection of results, we are able to derive common principles of the influence of surface and interface chemistry on the catalytic operation of SOFC anode materials. In situ measurements of the reactivity of water and carbon surface species on ZrO2- and Y2O3-based materials represent levels 1 and 2. The highest degree of complexity at level 3 is exemplified by combined surface science and catalytic studies of metal–oxide systems, oxidatively derived from intermetallic Cu–Zr and Pd–Zr compounds and featuring a large number of phases and interfaces. We show that only by appreciating insight into the basic building blocks of the catalyst materials at lower levels, a full understanding of the catalytic operation of the most complex materials at the highest level is possible.

Highlights

  • Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are part of the prospective energy infrastructure, some challenges in their adaption still remain

  • CONSPECTUS: In this Account, we demonstrate an increasing complexity approach to gain insight into the principal aspects of the surface and interface chemistry and catalysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anode and electrolyte materials based on selected oxide, intermetallic, and metal−oxide systems at different levels of material complexity, as well as into the fundamental microkinetic reaction steps and intermediates at catalytically active surface and interface sites

  • Exemplifying the use of SOFC anode materials and their surface and bulk chemistry relevant for different reforming processes, we have demonstrated a comprehensive workflow using a knowledge-based survey of the materials space, sampling different levels of complexity

Read more

Summary

■ INTRODUCTION

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are part of the prospective energy infrastructure, some challenges in their adaption still remain. For Pd−ZrO2, the composite metal−oxide state was obtained either by in situ decomposition of a Pd2Zr/Pd3Zr bulk intermetallic compound mixture or by forming a subsurface Pd−Zr alloy by reductive dissolution of chemical vapor-deposited ZrOx species into a Pd foil.[23,25] The reactivities of both systems in the dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction are vastly different: the CO formation rate is significantly higher on the bulk-derived Pd/ZrOx system (peaking at about 8.5 hPa min−1, Figure 7A) than on the on the subsurface alloy (0.3 hPa min−1, cf referenced to the reactivity on clean Pd and ZrO2 shown in both graphs, Figure 7A and C) The latter barely exceeds the activity of pure. Other obvious key criteria include the oxidation propensity and general thermodynamic stability of the chosen intermetallic compound/alloy or the metastability of the evolving oxide polymorph that is formed upon decomposition

■ SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVE
Findings
■ REFERENCES

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.