Increasing abdominal aortic aneurysm curvature visibility using 3D dual probe bistatic ultrasound imaging combined with probe translation

Abstract

High frame rate ultrasound (US) imaging techniques in 3D are promising tools for capturing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) over time, however, with the limited number of channel-to-element connections current footprints are small, which limits the field of view. Moreover, the maximal steering angle of the ultrasound beams in transmit and the maximal receptance angle in receive are insufficient for capturing the curvy shape of the AAA. Therefore, an approach is needed towards large arrays. In this study, high frame rate bistatic 3D US data (17 Hz) were acquired with two synchronized matrix arrays positioned at different locations (multi-aperture imaging) using a translation stage to simulate what a larger array with limited channel-to-element connections can potentially achieve. Acquisitions were performed along an AAA shaped phantom with different probe tilting angles (0 up to ± 30°). The performance of different multi-aperture configurations was quantified using the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio of the wall and lumen (gCNR). Furthermore, a parametric model of the multi-aperture system was used to estimate in which AAA wall regions the contrast is expected to be high. This was evaluated for AAAs with increasing diameters and curvature. With an eight-aperture 0° probe angle configuration a 69 % increase in field of view was measured in the longitudinal direction compared to the field of view of a single aperture configuration. When increasing the number of apertures from two to eight, the gCNR improved for the upper wall and lower wall by 35 % and 13 % (monostatic) and by 36 % and 13 % (bistatic). Contrast improvements up to 22 % (upper wall) and 12 % (lower wall) are achieved with tilted probe configurations compared to non-tilted configurations. Moreover, with bistatic imaging with tilted probe configurations gCNR improvements up to 4 % (upper wall) and 7 % (lower wall) are achieved compared to monostatic imaging. Furthermore, imaging with a larger inter-probe distance improved the gCNR for a ± 15° probe angle configuration. The gCNR has an expected pattern over time, where the contrast is lower when there is more wall motion (systole) and higher when motion is reduced (diastole). Furthermore, a higher frame rate (45 Hz) yields a lower gCNR, because fewer compound angles are used. The results of the parametric model suggest that a flat array is suitable for imaging AAA shapes with limited curvature, but that it is not suitable for imaging larger AAA shapes with more curvature. According to the model, tilted multi-aperture configurations combined with bistatic imaging can achieve a larger region with high contrast compared to non-tilted configurations. The findings of the model are in agreement with experimental findings. To conclude, this study demonstrates the vast improvements in field of view and AAA wall visibility that a large, sparsely populated 3D array can potentially achieve when imaging AAAs compared to single or dual aperture imaging. In the future, larger arrays, less thermal noise, more steering, and more channel-to-element connections combined with carefully chosen orientations of (sub-) apertures will likely advance 3D imaging of AAAs.