Abstract
Objectives To verify the cut-off values and to determine the clinical sensitivity of antithyroglobulin (TgAb) determinations using our routine RIA and the new electrochemiluminescent Elecsys assay. Design and methods We used the DYNOtest® anti-Tg n manual RIA from BRAHMS and the new automated Elecsys® electrochemiluminescent immunoassay from Roche Diagnostics. We analyzed 452 sera from the following subjects: 193 euthyroid controls, 163 with treated and untreated autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) (108 Graves' disease and 55 thyroiditis), 50 with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, 13 with nonautoimmune thyroid disease and 33 with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Results As expected, using the proposed thresholds (BRAHMS 60 kIU/L, Elecsys 115 kIU/L) ∼6% of the control subjects were positive for TgAb with both methods. In AITD patients, the sensitivity of TgAb determination was significantly higher with the Elecsys assay (51.5%) than with the BRAHMS assay (39.3%). This difference was not observed in the other patient groups. Conclusion The Elecsys assay can be preferred not only because it is automated and rapid, but also because of its better clinical performance in AITD patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
