Increased Sensitivity in Detection of Deficits Following Two Commonly Used Animal Models of Stroke

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. Most strokes are ischemic, resulting in both cognitive and motor impairments. Animal models of ischemic stroke such as the distal medial cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO) and photothrombotic stroke (PTS) procedures have become invaluable tools, with their own advantages and disadvantages. The dMCAO model is clinically relevant as it occludes the artery most affected in humans, but yields variability in the infarct location as well as the behavioral and cognitive phenotypes disrupted. The PTS model has the advantage of allowing for targeted location of infarct, but is less clinically relevant. The present study evaluates phenotype disruption over time in mice subjected to either dMCAO, PTS, or a sham surgery. Post-surgery, animals were tested over 28 days on standard motor tasks (grid walk, cylinder, tapered beam, and rotating beam), as well as a novel odor-based operant task; the 5:1 Odor Discrimination Task (ODT). Results demonstrate a significantly greater disturbance of motor control with PTS as compared with Sham and dMCAO. Disruption of the PTS group was detected up to 28 days post-stroke on the grid walk, and up to 7 days on the rotating and tapered beam tasks. PTS also led to significant short-term disruption of ODT performance (1-day post-surgery), exclusively in males, which appeared to be driven by motoric disruption of the lick response. Together, this data provides critical insights into the selection and optimization of animal models for ischemic stroke research. Notably, the PTS procedure was best suited for producing disruptions of motor behavior that can be detected with common behavioral assays and are relatively enduring, as is observed in human stroke.