Increased Risk of Radioiodine Treatment Failure Associated with Graves Disease Refractory to Methimazole

Abstract

Objective: Iodine 131 (I-131) radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy has been the preferred treatment for Graves disease in the United States; however, trends show a shift toward antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy as first-line therapy. Consequently, this would favor RAI as second-line therapy, presumably for ATD refractory disease. Outcomes of RAI treatment after first-line ATD therapy are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment failure rates and potential risk factors for treatment failure, including ATD use prior to RAI treatment.Methods: A retrospective case control study of Graves disease patients (n = 200) after I-131 RAI therapy was conducted. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence or persistence of hyperthyroidism in the follow-up time after therapy (mean 2.3 years). Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors associated with treatment failure.Results: RAI treatment failure rate was 16.5%. A majority of patients (70.5%) used ATD prior to RAI therapy, predominantly methimazole (MMI) (91.9%), and approximately two-thirds of patients used MMI for >3 months prior to RAI therapy. Use of ATD prior to RAI therapy (P = .003) and higher 6-hour I-123 thyroid uptake prior to I-131 RAI therapy (P<.001) were associated with treatment failure. MMI use >3 months was also associated with treatment failure (P = .002).Conclusion: More patients may be presenting for RAI therapy after failing first-line ATD therapy. MMI use >3 months was associated with RAI treatment failure. Further studies are needed to investigate the association between long-term first-line ATD use and RAI treatment failure.