Increased Nuchal Translucency, Hydrops fetalis or Hygroma colli

Abstract

Objectives: Nuchal translucency measurement of 3 mm or more (≧95th centile for gestation age), hydrops fetalis or hygroma colli between the 11th and 14th weeks of gestation is associated with a higher risk of fetal Down syndrome and other aneuploidies. So far, chromosome preparation of chorionic villi samplings (CVS) after short-term (or direct) culture is the only valid, reliable and rapid method of choice for the early detection of chromosomal aberrations. However, because of the placental mosaicisms detected after short-term culture, CVS has to be confirmed by a second method. Moreover, short-term villi preparation does not always provide a sufficient quantity and quality of metaphases to enable cytogenetic analysis. Unfortunately, a predicative cytogenetic result will be available only after long-term cultivation (usually after 1–2 weeks). An alternative rapid method, inexpensive and suitable for diagnosing autosomal trisomies, is the quantitative fluorescence polymerase reaction (QF-PCR) using different polymorphic small tandem repeats (STRs) on CVS-DNA. Therefore, it was the aim of the study to evaluate whether a new CVS test strategy could be employed in early pregnancies at high risk after the rapid detection of fetal chromosomal abnormalities by QF-PCR for chromosomes 13, 18 or 21 and sexing in conjunction with short-term chromosome analysis. Materials: Nineteen CVS were chosen for QF-PCR detection of trisomy 21, 18 or 13 after an increased nuchal translucency measurement (≧95th centile for gestation age), a hydrops fetalis or a hygroma colli. The amelogenin locus of chromosomes X and Y (AMXY) were used for sexing. The QF-PCR results were compared with routine karyotyping after short- and/or long-term cultivation of CVS cells. Results: An informative result was demonstrated in all analysed specimens. Nine CVS were diagnosed as a QF-PCR trisomy either for chromosome 21, 18 and 13. The pathological samples also included 4 cases of mosaicism where the normal cell line was not identified by QF-PCR. In 1 additional case with a normal QF-PCR result, short-term CVS chromosome analysis showed a mosaic trisomy 13, whereas longterm CVS culture revealed a normal karyotype. The malformed aborted fetus showed no clinical signs of trisomy 13, confirming the normal results obtained by QF-PCR and long-term CVS chromosome analysis. One pregnancy with a Turner syndrome was not identified by molecular analysis. Conclusions: This study showed that all early pregnancies with a clinically relevant autosomal trisomy could be detected prenatally in routine practice by QF-PCR. The combined use of both rapid methods – QF-PCR and short-term chromosome analysis – optimise the results by minimising the possibility of false-positive or false-negative findings. We believe that after verification of a pathological result obtained by two independent methods (QF-PCR and short-term CVS chromosome analysis), long-term villi cultivation is no longer necessary. However, in all cases with discrepancies, especially in samples with mosaic findings at short-term CVS cultivation, further studies are still necessary.