Increased hospital volume is associated with improved outcomes following abdominal-based breast reconstruction

Abstract

Previous studies of outcomes following abdominal-based breast reconstruction largely use data from single-centre/surgeon experience. Such studies are limited in evaluating the effect of operative volume on outcomes. Abdominal-based breast reconstructive procedures were identified in the 2009–2010 HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Outcomes included in-hospital microvascular complications in free flap cases (requiring exploration/anastomosis revision), procedure-related and total complications in all cases, and length of stay (LOS). High-volume hospitals were defined as 90th percentile of case volume or higher (>30 flaps/year). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcomes. Of the 4107 patients identified, mean age was 50.7 years; 71% were white, 68% underwent free flap reconstruction, and 25% underwent bilateral reconstruction. The total complication rate was 13.2%, and the microvascular complication rate was 7.0%. Mean LOS was 4.5 days. There were 436 hospitals; 59% of cases were performed at high-volume institutions. Patients at high-volume hospitals more often underwent free flap reconstruction compared to low-volume hospitals (82.4% vs 50.5%, p < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, microvascular complication rates of 6.4% vs 8.2% were observed for high-volume compared to low-volume hospitals (p = 0.080). After adjusting for case-mix, high-volume hospitals were associated with a decreased likelihood of suffering a microvascular complication (OR = 0.71, p = 0.026), procedure-related complication (OR = 0.79, p = 0.033), or total complication (OR = 0.75, p = 0.004). The majority of cases nationwide are performed at a small number of high-volume hospitals. These hospitals appear to discharge patients earlier and have lower microvascular, procedure-related, and total complication rates when controlling for case-mix.