Abstract
BackgroundInternal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is often unchanged or minimally improved. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of glenoid baseplate version on postoperative internal rotation. The secondary purpose to investigate the effects of baseplate retroversion on external rotation (ER) and patients reported outcomes (PROs). MethodsA retrospective review was performed on a prospectively maintained multicenter database of patients who underwent primary RSA using a 135° humeral prosthesis and lateralized glenoid with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed by two independent observers who assessed preoperative glenoid version and postoperative glenoid baseplate version. Patients were stratified by postoperative retroversion (<10°, 10-19° or >20°) and change in version from preoperative to postoperative (ΔRV). Primary outcomes were internal rotation with the arm at 90° (IR90) and internal rotation estimated to nearest spinal level (IRspine). Secondary outcomes were active external rotation in adduction (ER0), active external rotation with arm at 90° (ER90), forward flexion (FF), and PROs. Linear regression analyses and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses were used for comparisons. Results274 patients with a mean of 71 years of age were included in the study. Patients with >10° of postoperative baseplate retroversion gained 20° of IR90 (p=0.005) without loss of ER90 (p<0.001) compared to patients with <10° of baseplate retroversion. More than 10° of postoperative baseplate retroversion was associated with significantly improved Constant-Murley scores (41.5, p=0.007) and SANE scores (45.4, p=0.047) compared to patients with less than <10° of baseplate retroversion. Patients with a ΔRV increase of > 10° had significantly improved IR90 (p=0.031) without loss of ER90 (p=0.019). There was no correlation between ΔRV and IRspine, ER0 or FF, or PROs. ConclusionWith a 135° and lateralized glenoid, postoperative baseplate retroversion of >10° was associated with significantly improved IR90, ER90, Constant-Murley and SANE scores at 2 years follow-up compared to <10° retroversion. Additionally an increased ΔRV from pre- to postoperative appears to improve IR90 without limiting ER0 or FF. While baseplate retroversion does not improve IRspine, overall function appears to be improved and therefore consideration may be given to accepting retroversion or intentionally retroverting the baseplate if fixation allows.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.