Increased Fracture Risk with Furosemide Use in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract

To determine the association of furosemide therapy with the incidence of bone fractures in children with congenital heart disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data extracted from the 2008-2014 Texas Medicaid databases. Pediatric patients aged <12 years diagnosed with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or heart failure were included. Patients taking furosemide were categorized into a furosemide-adherent group (medication possession ratio of ≥70%), and a furosemide-nonadherent group (medication possession ratio of <70%). A third group of patients was matched to the furosemide user groups by using propensity score matching. A multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model with a Kaplan-Meier plot (time-to-fracture) were used to compare the 3 groups, controlling for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics. After matching, 3912 patients (furosemide adherent, n = 254; furosemide nonadherent, n = 724; no furosemide, n = 2934) were identified. The incidence of fractures was highest for the furosemide-adherent group (9.1%; 23 of 254), followed by the furosemide-nonadherent group (7.2%; 52 of 724), which were both higher than for patients who did not receive furosemide (5.0%; 148 of 2934) (P < .001). Using logistic regression, both furosemide groups were more likely to have fractures than the no furosemide group: furosemide-adherent OR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.17-2.98; P = .009); furosemide nonadherent OR of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.10-2.14; P = .01). In the Cox proportional hazard model, the risk of fractures for the furosemide-adherent group was significantly higher compared with the no furosemide group (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.00-2.42; P = .04). Furosemide therapy, even with nonconsistent dosing, was associated with an increased risk of bone fractures in children with congenital heart disease.