Abstract

To compare the duration of effect of two dosage regimes of botulinum toxin A to treat patients with Frey's syndrome. Prospective study of two unselected cohorts of 20 patients each. The dimension of the affected skin area was determined with Minors iodine-starch test. The skin was infiltrated with botulinum toxin type A (Dysport, Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen, Germany) using an interinjection distance of 1 cm. In the first group, a concentration of 10 mount units (MU)/0.1 mL and in the second group a concentration of 20 MU/0.1 mL was used. At each injection site, 0.1 mL of the respective solution was injected. The outcome measures were the time of reappearance of gustatory sweating, and the results of an iodine-starch test 10 and 20 months after treatment. Using the lower concentration, the mean duration of effectiveness was 8.3 +/- 2 months (mean +/- standard deviation). Using the higher concentration, the effect was much longer at 16.5 +/- 6 months. Eighty-five percent of the first group but only 5% of the second had a positive Minor's iodine-starch test 10 months after treatment. After 20 months four patients in the second group still had a negative iodine-starch test. In both groups, the amount of required botulinum toxin for the second treatment after recurrence of Frey's syndrome was the same as for the first treatment. Using a higher concentration of botulinum toxin type A (20 MU Dysport/0.1 mL) is more effective than a lower concentration (10 MU Dysport/0.1 mL) in the treatment of Frey's syndrome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.