Abstract

BackgroundDreaming is a universal experience, yet there is considerable inter-individual variability in dream recall frequency (DRF). One dominant model, the “arousal-retrieval” model, posits that intra-sleep wakefulness is required for dream traces to be encoded into long-term storage, essentially proposing that a better memory for dreams underlie increased DRF. A recent study utilizing polysomnography combined with an event-related potentials paradigm, provides direct support for this model by demonstrating increased intra-sleep wakefulness in a healthy population by comparing high frequency recallers (HFRs) and low frequency recallers (LFRs). Another study by the same group demonstrated increased regional cerebral blood flow in regions associated with dream production, supporting the premise that HFRs also may produce more dreams.HypothesesThis study investigated the profile of nocturnal awakenings and dream production in healthy HFRs and LFRs. Hypothesis (1a): HFRs will spend significantly more time awake after sleep onset; (1b): HFRs will experience significantly more awakenings across the night, and from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in particular; (2) HFRs will have significantly higher rates of dream production across the night as measured by REM density.MethodsWe studied two groups of healthy adults: HFRs (n = 19) and LFRs (n = 17) who underwent polysomnographic recordings on two non-consecutive nights.ResultsHypothesis (1a) was confirmed: HFRs spent significantly more time awake after sleep onset. Hypothesis (1b) was partially confirmed: HFRs experienced significantly more awakenings across the night; however, awakenings from REM sleep were comparable. Interestingly, HFRs had significantly more awakenings, as well as a higher number of longer awakenings, from non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stage 2 sleep. Hypothesis (2) was not confirmed: There was no significant difference in rates of REM density between groups.ConclusionThis is the first study to provide evidence that awakenings from NREM 2 sleep might underlie increased DRF in HFRs. This finding coupled with null findings in relation to REM sleep variables, support the premise that inter-individual variability in DRF cannot be ascribed to differences in REM sleep parameters in healthy individuals. Instead, the data indicates that awakenings from NREM sleep is of particular importance in relation to DRF in a healthy population.

Highlights

  • Dream recall rates vary considerably between individuals (Schredl et al, 2007)

  • Our findings revealed that, firstly, high frequency recallers (HFRs) experienced significantly more total awakenings across the night when compared to the low frequency recallers (LFRs), and secondly, that there was no significant difference in the number of awakenings from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep between groups

  • In order to further elucidate this finding, we investigated whether HFRs experience significantly more awakenings lasting ≥2 min from both REM and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) 2 sleep compared to LFRs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dream recall rates vary considerably between individuals (Schredl et al, 2007). Multiple models have been developed in an attempt to explain this variability (Freud, 1958; Schonbar, 1965; Cohen and Wolfe, 1973; Cohen and MacNeilage, 1974). The arousal-retrieval model (Koulack and Goodenough, 1976) is supported by reliable empirical evidence (For a review, see Schredl, 1999; Schredl et al, 2003a,b) This model proposes a mechanism for how dream content is transferred from short-term consciousness to long-term memory storage. According to the model, a period of wakefulness is necessary to enable long-term storage of shortterm dream content. The “arousalretrieval” model, posits that intra-sleep wakefulness is required for dream traces to be encoded into long-term storage, essentially proposing that a better memory for dreams underlie increased DRF. A recent study utilizing polysomnography combined with an event-related potentials paradigm, provides direct support for this model by demonstrating increased intra-sleep wakefulness in a healthy population by comparing high frequency recallers (HFRs) and low frequency recallers (LFRs). Hypothesis (1a): HFRs will spend significantly more time awake after sleep onset; (1b): HFRs will experience significantly more awakenings across the night, and from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in particular; (2) HFRs will have significantly higher rates of dream production across the night as measured by REM density

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call