Abstract

BackgroundOur objectives were to characterize sow life and herd-life performance and examine two-way interactions between age at first-mating (AFM) and either herd size or herd productivity groups for the performance of sows. Data contained 146,140 sows in 143 Spanish herds. Sow life days is defined as the number of days from birth to removal, whereas the herd-life days is from AFM date to removal date. Herds were categorized into two herd size groups and two productivity groups based on the respective 75th percentiles of farm means of herd size and the number of piglets weaned per sows per year: large (> 1017 sows) or small-to-mid herds (< 1017 sows), and high productivity (> 26.5 piglets) or ordinary herds (< 26.5 piglets). A two-level liner mixed-effects model was applied to examine AFM, herd size groups, productivity groups and their interactions for sow life or herd-life performance.ResultsNo differences were found between either herd size or herd productivity groups for AFM or the number of parity at removal. However, late AFM was associated with decreased removal parity, herd-life days, herd-life piglets born alive and herd-life annualized piglets weaned, as well as with increased sow life days and herd-life nonproductive days (P < 0.05). Also, significant two-way interactions between AFM and both herd size and productivity groups were found for longevity, prolificacy, fertility and reproductive efficiency of sows. For example, as AFM increased from 190 to 370 days, sows in large herds decreased herd-life days by 156 days, whereas for sows in small-to-mid herds the decrease was only 42 days. Also, for the same AFM increase, sows in large herds had 5 fewer sow life annualized piglets weaned, whereas for sows in small-to-mid herds this sow reproductive efficiency measure was only decreased by 3.5 piglets. Additionally, for ordinary herds, sows in large herds had more herd-life annualized piglets weaned than those in small-to-mid herds (P < 0.05), but no such association was found for high productivity herds (P > 0.10).ConclusionWe recommend decreasing the number of late AFM sows in the herd and also recommend improving longevity and lifetime efficiency of individual sows.

Highlights

  • Our objectives were to characterize sow life and herd-life performance and examine two-way interactions between age at first-mating (AFM) and either herd size or herd productivity groups for the performance of sows

  • The significant association for herd-life annualized piglets weaned only occurred with ordinary herds, where sows in large herds had more herd-life annualized piglets weaned than those in small-to-mid herds (P < 0.05); no such association was found for high productivity herds (P > 0.10)

  • Our study revealed that the decrease in the number of parity at removal and sow herd-life days was greater for large herds than for small-to-mid herds as AFM increased

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our objectives were to characterize sow life and herd-life performance and examine two-way interactions between age at first-mating (AFM) and either herd size or herd productivity groups for the performance of sows. Lifetime performance of sows can be measured as longevity, prolificacy, fertility and reproductive efficiency. Longevity is commonly measured as the number of parity at removal [1], sow herd-life days [2, 3] or sow life days which are from the birth date to the removal date. Using sow life days or herd-life days as a denominator, annualized piglets weaned can be used as an integrated measurement for reproductive efficiency of individual sows combining fertility, prolificacy and longevity. A common benchmarking measurement to monitor reproductive efficiency within the herd or to compare productivity of different herds is the number of pigs weaned per sow per year (PSY) [1, 4]. Some producers cull low parity sows with fewer piglets born alive to maintain high herd productivity [6, 7]. High sow longevity can increase the profit per sow because lifetime piglets weaned by parity 3 or higher sows retrieve the initial cost of a replacement gilt [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call