Abstract

Invasive species often evolve rapidly following introduction despite genetic bottlenecks that may result from small numbers of founders; however, some invasions may not fit this “genetic paradox”. The invasive cane toad (Rhinella marina) displays high phenotypic variation across its introduced Australian range. Here, we used three genome-wide datasets to characterize their population structure and genetic diversity. We found that toads form three genetic clusters: 1) native range toads, 2) toads from the source population in Hawaii and long-established areas near introduction sites in Australia, and 3) toads from more recently established northern Australian sites. Although we find an overall reduction in genetic diversity following introduction, we do not see this reduction in loci putatively under selection, suggesting that genetic diversity may have been maintained at ecologically relevant traits, or that mutation rates were high enough to maintain adaptive potential. Nonetheless, toads encounter novel environmental challenges in Australia, and the transition between genetic clusters occurs at a point along the invasion transect where temperature rises and rainfall decreases. We identify environmentally associated loci known to be involved in resistance to heat and dehydration. This study highlights that natural selection occurs rapidly and plays a vital role in shaping the structure of invasive populations.

Highlights

  • The genetic paradox of invasion (Allendorf, 2003) describes a phenomenon that challenges widespread evidence of the relationship between genetic diversity and adaptive potential

  • We tested whether cane toads fit the commonly invoked “genetic paradox of invasion, ” leading to our prediction of lower genetic diversity in invasive populations compared to those in the native range

  • We found three genetic clusters: 1) native range toads, 2) Hawaiian source toads and eastern Australian range core toads, and 3) all toads from further west in more recently colonized areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genetic paradox of invasion (Allendorf, 2003) describes a phenomenon that challenges widespread evidence of the relationship between genetic diversity and adaptive potential. Despite the fact that invasive populations are thought to undergo genetic bottlenecks due to the translocation of a small number of founders from their native range to an introduced range (Barrett and Kohn, 1991; Allendorf, 2003), invasive species are characterized by their ability to establish and spread in their introduced ranges. This could be facilitated by factors such as empty ecological niches or a lack of natural enemies (Colautti et al, 2004). There are many examples of evolutionary change during invasion without high levels of genetic diversity (Rollins et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.