Abstract

This study investigated fatty acid (FA) esterification patterns in ruminant and non-ruminant liver and small intestine (SI) explants. Explants were incubated in media containing 14C-labeled essential FA (EFA; C18:2 or C18:3) or non-EFA (C16:0 or C18:1), to track esterification of FA into lipid classes. Mean FA uptake was greater for porcine than bovine liver explants (23.9 vs 15.9±1.8 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P=0.03). Liver cultures of both species incorporated more non-EFA than EFA (22.9 vs 16.9±1.6 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P<0.001). Porcine SI cultures esterified more non-EFA than EFA (17.9 vs 12.4±2.0 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P<0.001). Bovine liver and SI explants esterified more FA into triglyceride (TG) than phospholipid (PL) (Liver: 2.4 vs 1.4±0.4 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P=0.04, SI: 3.5 vs 2.4±0.3 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P=0.01). Porcine liver and SI explants did not exhibit preferential esterification of FA into either lipid class. Culture with EFA increased PL:TG in bovine liver explants, compared to non-EFA culture (0.68 vs 0.49±0.1 nmol/2 h/150 mg tissue, P=0.01). There was no difference in PL:TG in bovine SI explants, or porcine liver and SI explants cultured with EFA or non-EFA. Results suggest differing liver esterification patterns in bovids and porcids, with esterification patterns of ruminants possibly facilitating greater EFA esterification into PL. Support provided by NSF grant IOS-0920491.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.