Abstract
Abstract Introduction Incorporating information on animal behavior in resource-based predictive modeling (e.g., occurrence mapping) can elucidate the relationship between process and spatial pattern and depict habitat in terms of its structure as well as its function. In this paper, we assigned location data on brood-rearing greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) to either within-patch (encamped) or between-patch (traveling) behavioral modes by estimating a movement-based relative displacement index. Objectives were to estimate and validate spatially explicit models of within- versus between-patch resource selection for application in habitat management and compare these models to a non-behaviorally adjusted model. Results A single model, the vegetation and water resources model, was most plausible for both the encamped and traveling modes, including the non-behaviorally adjusted model. When encamped, sage-grouse selected for taller shrubs, avoided bare ground, and were closer to mesic areas. Traveling sage-grouse selected for greater litter cover and herbaceous vegetation. Preference for proximity to mesic areas was common to both encamped and traveling modes and to the non-behaviorally adjusted model. The non-behaviorally adjusted map was similar to the encamped model and validated well. However, we observed different selection patterns during traveling that could have been masked had behavioral state not been accounted for. Conclusions Characterizing habitat that structured between-patch movement broadens our understanding of the habitat needs of brood-rearing sage-grouse, and the combined raster surface offers a reliable habitat management tool that is readily amenable to application by GIS users in efforts to focus sustainable landscape management.
Highlights
Incorporating information on animal behavior in resource-based predictive modeling can elucidate the relationship between process and spatial pattern and depict habitat in terms of its structure as well as its function
We found that resource selection during traveling exhibits a much different pattern of selection because these landscape features serve a different purpose compared to the general selection patterns of sage-grouse that occur for a wide-range of behaviors
Most overlap in the selection for resources occurred between encamped and non-behaviorally adjusted models, selection patterns for some features, primarily mesic areas, were similar across all behaviors and models
Summary
Incorporating information on animal behavior in resource-based predictive modeling (e.g., occurrence mapping) can elucidate the relationship between process and spatial pattern and depict habitat in terms of its structure as well as its function. We assigned location data on brood-rearing greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) to either within-patch (encamped) or between-patch (traveling) behavioral modes by estimating a movement-based relative displacement index. Objectives were to estimate and validate spatially explicit models of within- versus between-patch resource selection for application in habitat management and compare these models to a non-behaviorally adjusted model. Long-term population declines have been observed throughout much of the species distribution (Connelly and Braun 1997; Connelly et al 2004; Fedy and Aldridge 2011). Identifying resources necessary for critical life-history phases (e.g., brood-rearing, nesting, and roosting) and survival are important for managing landscapes (Dzialak et al 2011b), especially when landscapes are exposed to large-scale modification from climatic and anthropogenic sources. The needs of brooded hens and their chicks revolve around nutrition acquisition, protection
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
