Abstract
Basin‐average albedo estimated from remotely‐sensed Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectroradiometer (AVIRIS) data specific to the catchment typically differed by 20% from albedo estimated using a common snow‐age‐based empirical relation. In some parts of the basin, differences were as large as 0.31. Using the AVIRIS albedo estimates in a distributed snowmelt model that explicitly includes net solar radiation resulted in a much more accurate estimate of the timing and magnitude of snowmelt as compared to the same model with the empirical albedo (R2 of 0.73 versus 0.59 and magnitude error of 2% versus 36%). Model improvement was most significant in areas and at times where incident solar radiation was relatively high and temperatures low.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have