Abstract

BackgroundDiagnostic and prognostic literature is overwhelmed with studies reporting univariable predictor-outcome associations. Currently, methods to incorporate such information in the construction of a prediction model are underdeveloped and unfamiliar to many researchers.MethodsThis article aims to improve upon an adaptation method originally proposed by Greenland (1987) and Steyerberg (2000) to incorporate previously published univariable associations in the construction of a novel prediction model. The proposed method improves upon the variance estimation component by reconfiguring the adaptation process in established theory and making it more robust. Different variants of the proposed method were tested in a simulation study, where performance was measured by comparing estimated associations with their predefined values according to the Mean Squared Error and coverage of the 90% confidence intervals.ResultsResults demonstrate that performance of estimated multivariable associations considerably improves for small datasets where external evidence is included. Although the error of estimated associations decreases with increasing amount of individual participant data, it does not disappear completely, even in very large datasets.ConclusionsThe proposed method to aggregate previously published univariable associations with individual participant data in the construction of a novel prediction models outperforms established approaches and is especially worthwhile when relatively limited individual participant data are available.

Highlights

  • Diagnostic and prognostic literature is overwhelmed with studies reporting univariable predictor-outcome associations

  • We evaluate the frequentist properties of the estimated associations in terms of the percentage bias (PB) and the Mean Squared Error (MSE) [32], where

  • A simple method for this purpose was proposed by Greenland and Steyerberg using the change from univariable to multivariable association observed in the individual participant data (IPD) to adapt the univariable associations from the literature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnostic and prognostic literature is overwhelmed with studies reporting univariable predictor-outcome associations. Recent medical literature has shown an increasing interest in clinical prediction models obtained from cross-sectional studies (diagnostic models) as well as casecontrol, cohort and randomized controlled data (prognostic models) [1,2,3,4,5]. Such models combine multiple predictors or markers that are independently associated with the presence (in case of diagnosis) or future occurrence (in case of prognosis) of a particular outcome. Numerous prediction models are constructed from a single dataset, it is possible to increase the amount of evidence available by incorporating information from the literature

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call