Abstract

A predictive component can contribute to the command signal for smooth pursuit. This is readily demonstrated by the fact that low frequency sinusoidal target motion can be tracked with zero time delay or even with a small lead. The objective of this study was to characterize the predictive contributions to pursuit tracking more precisely by developing analytical models for predictive smooth pursuit. Subjects tracked a small target moving in two dimensions. In the simplest case, the periodic target motion was composed of the sums of two sinusoidal motions (SS), along both the horizontal and the vertical axes. Motions following the same or similar paths, but having a richer spectral composition, were produced by having the target follow the same path but at a constant speed (CS), and by combining the horizontal SS velocity with the vertical CS velocity and vice versa. Several different quantitative models were evaluated. The predictive contribution to the eye tracking command signal could be modeled as a low-pass filtered target acceleration signal with a time delay. This predictive signal, when combined with retinal image velocity at the same time delay, as in classical models for the initiation of pursuit, gave a good fit to the data. The weighting of the predictive acceleration component was different in different experimental conditions, being largest when target motion was simplest, following the SS velocity profiles.

Highlights

  • Interacting with a moving target involves prediction, whether the target be pursued by means of eye movements or intercepted by a movement of the hand

  • Each panel shows from bottom to top the x– and y – velocities, the speed, and the direction of motion, positive being up and to the right and direction being measured in the counterclockwise direction from the right horizontal

  • Target motion is shown by the heavy black trace and the blue traces show the mean (61 SE) of the ocular response

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interacting with a moving target involves prediction, whether the target be pursued by means of eye movements or intercepted by a movement of the hand. When the direction and the time of the onset of target motion is predictable, smooth pursuit eye movements anticipate the target’s motion [6,7] in contrast to the latency of 100 ms or more when the motion onset is not predictable [8]. The addition of a harmonic component to a fundamental frequency alters the amplitude and timing of the response to the fundamental component [14]. This suggests that the nature or the extent of predictive mechanisms depends on the precise characteristics of the stimulus

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.