Abstract

The usefulness of semi-analytical thermal models for predicting the connection between process, microstructure and properties in powder bed fusion has been well illustrated in recent years. Such an approach provides predictions that are orders of magnitude more computationally efficient than numerical approaches. However, the opportunity to make predictions that span several orders of magnitude in space and time comes at the cost of significant simplifications, limiting fully quantitative predictions without empirical calibration. This approach relies on the solution to a linear problem meaning that first order non-linear effects induced by e.g. the temperature dependence of material properties and surface boundary conditions, are not incorporated. Here, we revisit these limitations and highlight ways that temperature varying material properties and radiative heat loss from the melt pool can be systematically accounted for without prior calibration. These corrections, made with an eye to minimizing additional computational overhead, bring the technique’s predictive capability much closer to that of higher fidelity thermal simulations without a significant computational cost. Quantitative comparisons to experiments are used to illustrate the important impact of including such corrections.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call