Abstract

There is widespread agreement that Indigenous students’ cultural knowledge is desirably incorporated into curriculum and pedagogical practice. Classroom research shows Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners can use the cognitive tools of their cultural community to engage with school science. We looked towards our own practice as teacher educators to investigate the question: how can pre-service teachers explore how Indigenous cultural knowledge can be used more productively in mathematics and science classrooms? Teachers across Australia are now regulated by the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST). Teacher education is now regulated by the National Graduate Teacher Standards (AITSL 2011). Standard 1.4 requires that graduating teachers are able to “demonstrate broad knowledge and understanding of the impact of culture, cultural identity and linguistic background on the education of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds”. Standard 2.4 requires that graduating teachers “demonstrate broad knowledge and understanding of and respect for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures and languages”. In this paper we present an account of our present understanding of capacity building practises, which are those pedagogies that draw on Indigenous students’ cultural resources: cultural disposition, community knowledge and cultural capital. A key purpose of the presentation is to emphasise the socially negotiated, cultural and embedded nature of meaning-making in science education and how this can be made more apparent given the current focus on implementing the National Professional Standards for Teachers and the new Australian Curriculum.

Highlights

  • Teachers across Australia are to be regulated by the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST)

  • The area in which we work as academics, is regulated by the National Graduate Teacher Standards (AITSL 2011)

  • TheEAustralian Curriculum is far from being a perfect document, but it does tend offer greater certainty within the long established discipline of science where we have found Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents are highly capable learners who bring a rich array of cultural resources to the classroom (Chigeza and Whitehouse 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teachers across Australia are to be regulated by the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST). Standard 2.4 requires that graduating teachers “demonstrate broad knowledge and understanding of and respect for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures and languages”. 51), work can be done in pre-service education to normalise the practice of teaching for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learning in the classroom. This is important, especially given that all students at school in Australia (and by inference their teachers) are subject to extensive performance measures. Engage with the national Australian Curriculum (version 5.1) F-10 cross curriculum priority: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and culture (ACARA 2013). TheEAustralian Curriculum is far from being a perfect document, but it does tend offer greater certainty within the long established discipline of science where we have found Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents are highly capable learners who bring a rich array of cultural resources to the classroom (Chigeza and Whitehouse 2010)

The Need for Culturally Enabling Modes of Practice
From Everyday Ways of Knowing to Formal Mathematics and Science Knowing
Legend negotiation at the interface
Cultural Resources Are Brought to the Classroom
Why a Capacity Building Approach Can Work
Conclusion
Works Cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call