Abstract
One of the challenges of implementing a case‐based medical curriculum is creating a “continuity of learning” that minimizes compartmentalization of the learning that occurs in a variety of settings and promotes students’ conception of their learning as an “integrated whole”. For anatomists at the University of North Dakota, our role in meeting that challenge has occurred in two distinct steps: 1) integrating a meaningful Year 1 human gross anatomy experience into a case/problem‐based curriculum, and 2) integrating the teaching of clinical imaging into Year 1 in a way that faithfully represents global educational objectives for the learning of clinical imaging established for all four years of the medical curriculum. Four principal factors emerged as critical for successfully accomplishing this: efficient use of less available time, implementation of an objective‐driven approach to learning anatomy, selection of cases that create a clear context for learning of anatomy, and meaningful dissection laboratory experiences. Each of these factors has also proved critical for integrating clinical imaging into the Year 1 curriculum, including an investment in state‐of‐the‐art digital technology for navigating and interpreting clinical imaging of patients. As a result, students have a clear sense that their learning is “patient‐centered” and relevant to their future practice of medicine.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.