Abstract

Conservation biology must set geographic conservation priorities not only based on the compositional or structural but also on the functional dimensions of biodiversity. However, assessing functional diversity is challenging at the regional scale. We propose the use of satellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs), defined here as patches of land surface that share similar primary production dynamics, to incorporate such aspects of ecosystem functional diversity into the selection of protected areas. We applied the EFT approach to the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, to characterize the regional heterogeneity of primary production dynamics in terms of EFTs; to set conservation priorities based on EFT richness and rarity; and to explore whether such EFT-based conservation priorities were consistent with and/or complementary to previous assessments focused on biodiversity composition and structure. EFTs were identified based on three ecosystem functional attributes derived from seasonal dynamics of the Enhanced Vegetation Index: the annual mean (proxy of primary production), the seasonal coefficient of variation (descriptor of seasonality), and the date of maximum (indicator of phenology). EFT-based priorities identified 26% of the peninsula as being of extreme or high priority and reinforced the value of the ecosystem functional diversity of areas already prioritized by traditional conservation assessments. In addition, our study revealed that biodiversity composition- and structure-based assessments had not identified the full range of important areas for EFT diversity and tended to better capture areas of high EFT rarity than those of high EFT richness. Our EFT-based assessment demonstrates how remotely sensed regional heterogeneity in ecosystem functions could reinforce and complement traditional conservation priority setting.

Highlights

  • Contemporary conservation planning faces the challenge of safeguarding the ecological processes required for the persistence of biodiversity over time (GBO4 2014) and for the supply of ecosystem services to people (Costanza 2012)

  • We focused on primary production because it is an integrative component of ecosystem functioning (Table 1—step 1; Virginia and Wall 2013), and its seasonal dynamics can be monitored through spectral vegetation indices

  • We identified three metrics capturing most of the variance in the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) seasonal dynamics (Ecosystem Functional Attributes, EFAs): annual production, seasonality, and phenology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary conservation planning faces the challenge of safeguarding the ecological processes required for the persistence of biodiversity over time (GBO4 2014) and for the supply of ecosystem services to people (Costanza 2012). To this end, protected areas must represent the most important areas for in situ global conservation effort (Watson and others 2014). The need for more representative global protected area networks (Visconti and others 2019) that account for the three dimensions of biodiversity (composition, structure, and function; Noss 1990) could greatly benefit from the explicit inclusion of ecosystem functions and processes that support biodiversity and ecosystem services (Meyer 1997; Cabello and others 2012; Pettorelli and others 2018; Lecina-Dıaz and others 2019)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call