Abstract

Determining the geographic connections between breeding and nonbreeding populations, termed migratory connectivity, is critical to advancing our understanding of the ecology and conservation of migratory species. Assignment models based on stable isotopes historically have been an important tool for studying migratory connectivity of small‐bodied species, but the low resolution of these assignments has generated interest into combining isotopes with other sources in information. Abundance is one of the most appealing data sources to include in isotope‐based assignments, but there are currently no statistical methods or guidelines for optimizing the contribution of stable isotopes and abundance for inferring migratory connectivity. Using known‐origin stable‐hydrogen isotope samples of six Neotropical migratory bird species, we rigorously assessed the performance of assignment models that differentially weight the contribution of the isotope and abundance data. For two species with adequate sample sizes, we used Pareto optimality to determine the set of models that simultaneously minimized both assignment error rate and assignment area. We then assessed the ability of the top models from these two species to improve assignments of the remaining four species compared to assignments based on isotopes alone. We show that the increased precision of models that include abundance is often offset by a large increase in assignment error. However, models that optimally weigh the abundance data relative to the isotope data can result in higher precision and, in some cases, lower error than models based on isotopes alone. The top models, however, depended on the distribution of relative breeding abundance, with patchier distributions requiring stronger downweighting of abundance, and we present general guidelines for future studies. These results confirm that breeding abundance can be an important source of information for studies investigating broad‐scale movements of migratory birds and potentially other taxa.

Highlights

  • Understanding how migratory species redistribute themselves across the annual cycle, known as migratory connectivity, is essential for understanding range dynamics, identifying key threats, and developing coordinated conservation actions

  • Using Pareto optimality, a method for multi-­objective optimization, we show that weighting the isotope and abundance data can increase the performance of assignment models but that the distribution of breeding abundance plays a critical role in determining the proper weightings

  • Given the low resolution of many intrinsic markers, including abundance in assignment models is appealing because it can often greatly increase the precision of assignments

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Understanding how migratory species redistribute themselves across the annual cycle, known as migratory connectivity, is essential for understanding range dynamics, identifying key threats, and developing coordinated conservation actions. The original model outlined by Royle and Rubenstein (2004) was developed to make geographic assignments to a few discrete breeding regions, the increasing availability of global isoscape and abundance surfaces has enabled researchers to make assignments on nearly continuous landscapes (Hobson et al, 2009; Sullivan et al, 2012; Van Wilgenburg & Hobson, 2011). This introduces a critical complication that has gone largely unrecognized. Using Pareto optimality, a method for multi-­objective optimization, we show that weighting the isotope and abundance data can increase the performance of assignment models but that the distribution of breeding abundance plays a critical role in determining the proper weightings

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
Downweight abundance for species with patchy distributions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call