Abstract

We describe a design for cancer phase I clinical trials that takes into account patients heterogeneity thought to be related to treatment susceptibility. The goal is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) given patient’s specific dichotomous covariate value. The design is Bayesian adaptive and is an extension of escalation with overdose control (EWOC). We will assess the performance of this method by comparing the following designs via extensive simulations: (1) design using a covariate; patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and the dose given to a patient depends on his/her baseline covariate value, (2) design ignoring the covariate; patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and the dose given to a patient does not depend on his/her baseline covariate value, and (3) design using separate trials; in each group, patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and EWOC is implemented in each group. These designs are compared with respect to safety of the trial and efficiency of the estimates of the MTDs via extensive simulations. We found that ignoring a significant baseline binary covariate in the model results in a substantial number of patients being overdosed. On the other hand, accounting for a nonsignificant covariate in the model has practically no effect on the safety of the trial and efficiency of the estimates of the MTDs.

Highlights

  • The main objective of cancer phase I clinical trials is to determine a maximum tolerated dose MTD of a new experimental drug or combination of known drugs for use in a phase II trial

  • We present design operating characteristics of a design proposed by Babb et al 5 known as escalation with overdose control EWOC by accounting for patients heterogeneity thought to be related to treatment susceptibility

  • In the case of a binary covariate, we will assess the performance of this method by comparing the following designs via extensive simulations: 1 design using a covariate; patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and the dose given to a patient depends on his/her covariate value, 2 design ignoring the covariate; patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and the dose given to a patient does not depend on his/her covariate value, and 3 design using separate trials; in each group, patients are accrued to the trial sequentially and EWOC is implemented in each group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main objective of cancer phase I clinical trials is to determine a maximum tolerated dose MTD of a new experimental drug or combination of known drugs for use in a phase II trial. O’Quigley et al investigated the performance of a two-stage continual reassessment method CRM using a binary covariate They considered 3 different models for the dose-toxicity relationship and maximum likelihood method was used to estimate the model parameters. Babb and Rogatko extended EWOC to allow the utilization of information concerning individual patient differences in susceptibility to treatment. This was applied to a trial involving patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of gastrointestinal origin treated with PNU-214565 PNU.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call