Abstract
The development of deep learning (DL) algorithms is a three-step process-training, tuning, and testing. Studies are inconsistent in the use of the term "validation", with some using it to refer to tuning and others testing, which hinders accurate delivery of information and may inadvertently exaggerate the performance of DL algorithms. We investigated the extent of inconsistency in usage of the term "validation" in studies on the accuracy of DL algorithms in providing diagnosis from medical imaging. We analyzed the full texts of research papers cited in two recent systematic reviews. The papers were categorized according to whether the term "validation" was used to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, or testing alone. We analyzed whether paper characteristics (i.e., journal category, field of study, year of print publication, journal impact factor [JIF], and nature of test data) were associated with the usage of the terminology using multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Of 201 papers published in 125 journals, 118 (58.7%), 9 (4.5%), and 74 (36.8%) used the term to refer to tuning alone, both tuning and testing, and testing alone, respectively. A weak association was noted between higher JIF and using the term to refer to testing (i.e., testing alone or both tuning and testing) instead of tuning alone (vs. JIF <5; JIF 5 to 10: adjusted odds ratio 2.11, P = 0.042; JIF >10: adjusted odds ratio 2.41, P = 0.089). Journal category, field of study, year of print publication, and nature of test data were not significantly associated with the terminology usage. Existing literature has a significant degree of inconsistency in using the term "validation" when referring to the steps in DL algorithm development. Efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and clarity in the terminology usage.
Highlights
Deep learning (DL), often used almost synonymously with artificial intelligence (AI), is the most dominant type of machine learning technique at present
Existing literature has a significant degree of inconsistency in using the term “validation” when referring to the steps in deep learning (DL) algorithm development
Such inconsistency in terminology usage or inaccurate use of “validation” to refer to testing are likely due to the fact that the term is typically used in general communication as well as in medicine to refer to the testing of the accuracy of a completed algorithm [6, 20], while the field of machine learning uses it as a very specific term that refers to the tuning step [4,5,6, 12, 17, 19, 21]
Summary
Deep learning (DL), often used almost synonymously with artificial intelligence (AI), is the most dominant type of machine learning technique at present. The real-world performance of a DL algorithm tested on adequate external datasets tends to be lower, often by large degrees, than those obtained with internal datasets during the tuning step [3, 6, 22,23,24]. Such mixed usage of the terminology may inadvertently exaggerate the performance of DL algorithms to researchers and the general public alike who are not familiar with machine learning.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
