Abstract

Abstract. This study quantifies the inconsistency in gauge precipitation observations across the border of Alaska and Yukon. It analyses the precipitation measurements by the national standard gauges (National Weather Service (NWS) 8 in. gauge and Nipher gauge) and the bias-corrected data to account for wind effect on the gauge catch, wetting loss and trace events. The bias corrections show a significant amount of errors in the gauge records due to the windy and cold environment in the northern areas of Alaska and Yukon. Monthly corrections increase solid precipitation by 136 % in January and 20 % for July at the Barter Island in Alaska, and about 31 % for January and 4 % for July at the Yukon stations. Regression analyses of the monthly precipitation data show a stronger correlation for the warm months (mainly rainfall) than for cold month (mainly snowfall) between the station pairs, and small changes in the precipitation relationship due to the bias corrections. Double mass curves also indicate changes in the cumulative precipitation over the study periods. This change leads to a smaller and inverted precipitation gradient across the border, representing a significant modification in the precipitation pattern over the northern region. Overall, this study discovers significant inconsistency in the precipitation measurements across the USA–Canada border. This discontinuity is greater for snowfall than for rainfall, as gauge snowfall observations have large errors in windy and cold conditions. This result will certainly impact regional, particularly cross-border, climate and hydrology investigations.

Highlights

  • It is known that discontinuities in precipitation measurements may exist across the national boundaries because of the different instruments and observation methods used (Nitu and Wong, 2010; Sanderson, 1975; Sevruk and Klemm, 1989; Yang et al, 2001)

  • The National Weather Service (NWS) 8 in. gauge is used for precipitation measurements in the United States (USA), and the Nipher snow gauge has been used in Canada for decades

  • Based on the analyses of the measured precipitation (Pm) and corrected precipitation (Pc) data, this section presents the results on the bias corrections of monthly and yearly precipitation for each station, regression and correlation of monthly precipitation data between the stations, and cumulative precipitation via the double mass curves for the warm and cold seasons

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is known that discontinuities in precipitation measurements may exist across the national boundaries because of the different instruments and observation methods used (Nitu and Wong, 2010; Sanderson, 1975; Sevruk and Klemm, 1989; Yang et al, 2001). Different instruments have been used in various observational networks within the same country. The Type-B rain gauge and Nipher gauge are the standard manual instruments for rain and snow observations in Canada (Mekis and Vincent, 2011; Metcalfe and Goodison, 1993), and recently the Geonor automatic gauges have been installed. Instruments change over time at most operational networks, resulting in significant breaks in data records. The COOP gauges were sensitive to wind biases, over winter when COOP observed (10 %) less precipitation than the US Climate Refer-

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call