Abstract

Biomolecules for OMIC analysis of microbial communities are commonly extracted by bead-beating or ultra-sonication, but both showed varying yields. In addition to that, different disruption pressures are necessary to lyse bacteria and fungi. However, the disruption efficiency and yields comparing bead-beating and ultra-sonication of different biological material have not yet been demonstrated. Here, we show that ultra-sonication in a bath transfers three times more energy than bead-beating over 10 min. TEM imaging revealed intact gram-positive bacterial and fungal cells whereas the gram-negative bacterial cells were destroyed beyond recognition after 10 min of ultra-sonication. DNA extraction using 10 min of bead-beating revealed higher yields for fungi but the extraction efficiency was at least three-fold lower considering its larger genome. By our critical viewpoint, we encourage the review of the commonly used extraction techniques as we provide evidence for a potential underrepresentation of resistant microbes, particularly fungi, in ecological studies.

Highlights

  • Finding efficient cell disruption techniques is crucial to various scientific fields

  • Differential resistance during cell disruption can bias the extraction of biomolecules towards easy-to-lyse microbes, which can skew the previously estimated microbiome compositions, ranging from the human gut[7] to forest soil ecosystems[8]

  • These differences in resistance could derive from differences in the cell wall chemistry since muramic acid exclusively occurs in bacterial cell walls[9,10] whereas fungal cell walls are the dominant source of glucosamine[9] or from the varying degrees of cell aggregates in fungi to shield individual cells from the disruption treatment[11]

Read more

Summary

OPEN Incomplete cell disruption of resistant microbes

Robert Starke[1,2], Nico Jehmlich 3, Trinidad Alfaro[1], Alice Dohnalkova[1], Petr Capek 1, Sheryl L. Ultra-sonication in a bath for 10 min revealed a strong resistance of the fungal and the gram-positive bacterial enrichment culture, both remained almost intact, whereas no intact cells could be found in the gram-negative bacterial enrichment culture after identical treatment, suggesting complete cell disruption beyond recognition (Figs 2 and S2–4). This could be the reason for the underrepresentation of resistant microbes, fungi, in ecological studies[15,16,17] that might skew microbiomes of various nature towards easy-to-lyse microbes.

Enrichment NUA YMA CDA
Materials and Methods
Author Contributions
Additional Information

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.