Abstract

We study non-linear income taxation in a standard Mirrlees model, but allow for arbitrary heterogeneity in preferences. Our main theoretical result is a set of necessary and (locally) sufficient conditions for a tax schedule to be rationalizable within a very broad class of welfare functions. This test combines a standard first-order condition with a novel second-order condition. The latter reflects that, when households with the same income have very different taxable income elasticities, the planner can reform taxes to (a) sort households into different parts of the income distribution based on their elasticities and—at the same time—(b) exploit this separation with higher taxes on the less elastic. Moving to the data, we evaluate our test using novel estimates of the variance of taxable income elasticities by income bracket. In the NBER sample of tax returns from 1979 to 1990, our second-order condition fails every year. This implies that a “free lunch” is available through tax reform.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.