Abstract

The paper intends to study the nature of income inequalities, food security and poverty among different sub-groups of population in West Bengal, India. It has been found that inequalities in terms of share of total income and population exist both in case of agricultural and non-agricultural income irrespective of sub-groups. The contribution of agricultural income in the income profile is less than that of non-agricultural income which exhibits the deplorable condition of agriculture and thereby the non-agricultural sector has an immense scope for reduction of income inequality even the fact remains that about 65 per cent of the rural population engages in agriculture. The study observed that so far as food security is concerned, though India achieved self-sufficiency in food grain production since 1970s, the achievement did not percolate down to masses. These deprivations are very acute with differentiated degrees of severity in almost all sub-groups except medium farms. Inequality in income is much higher than that of food insecurity in all sub-groups which is in conformity with Engel’s Law. While comparing the depth of food insecurity with poverty, it reveals that though the severity of poverty as well as food insecurity is highest in small farms, but these two do not keeping same connotations for the marginal and landless households. Hence it comes to the consequence that the severity of food insecurity not only depends on the severity of poverty but on some other factors too.

Highlights

  • The contribution of agricultural income in the income profile is less than that of non-agricultural income which exhibits the deplorable condition of agriculture and thereby the non-agricultural sector has an immense scope for reduction of income inequality even the fact remains that about 65 per cent of the rural population engages in agriculture

  • Income inequality causes structural problems that can lead to hindrance in economic growth, food security, poverty and social unrest

  • The poverty gap index (P1) may be written as food insecurity gap is measured by the same function, where z is the minimum energy requirement and yi is the actual intake of energy derived from food consumption for food unsecured individual; the gap is considered to be zero for food secured individual

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Income inequality causes structural problems that can lead to hindrance in economic growth, food security, poverty and social unrest. Many economists have emphasized the importance of economic growth in conjunction with investing to increase the productivity of the agriculture sector and promoting human capital development. In the decades of 80’s and 90’s the growth rate of food grains had outstripped that of population in West Bengal It is, obvious that there should not be poverty in the state. Neither the agricultural growth nor the favourable change in rural income distribution could be sustained in the following period (Chattopadhyay, 2005) Under this background, an attempt has been made to study the nature of income inequalities, food security and poverty among different sub-groups of population. Second is to measure the poverty gap along with the poverty line as well as food gap from the minimum food requirement to attain food security and third to compare income inequality with severity of poverty and food insecurity

Data Base and Methodology
Inequality in Income and Food Security
Poverty and Food Insecurity Gaps
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call