Abstract
This paper examines income effects in regression estimates of the elasticity of taxable income (ETI). One previous approach involves the proportional change in the average net-of-tax rate. It is shown that this specification can be derived from a direct utility function. Alternatively, income effects have been examined using the proportional change in virtual income. Estimation of the ETI must deal with endogeneity because observed marginal tax rates and taxable incomes are jointly determined. This paper suggests that where data are available to allow ‘no reform’ income dynamics to be estimated, they can be used to obtain the required counterfactual change in taxable income. This enables OLS to be used with an exogenous counterfactual ‘expected (marginal) tax rate’ proxy. The two specifications were estimated for New Zealand, and suggest that income effects are, at most, relatively small. They are statistically significant, and negative, only when using the change in virtual income. Importantly, the size of the ETI (which varies when income effects are present) is different depending on the specification used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.