Income and antiplatelet adherence following percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the relation of annual household income to antiplatelet adherence following PCI. BackgroundTreatment with 6–12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a Class I recommendation. Adherence to these medications is essential to reduce risk of stent thrombosis and recurrent ischemic events. Social risk factors like household income modify how patients access and adhere to essential pharmacologic therapies such as antiplatelet agents. MethodsWe identified individuals presenting with PCI in an administrative claims database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries from 2017 to 2019. We collected data on age, sex, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and covariates (prevalent coronary disease, medications, healthcare visits, insurance type, copay, antiplatelet medications, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index conditions). We related annual household income, categorized as <$40,000; $40–49,999; $50–59,999; $60–74,999; $75–99,999; and ≥$100 K, to proportion of days covered (PDC) in multivariable-adjusted regression models. We defined non-adherence as PDC <80%. ResultsOur dataset included 90,163 individuals (age 69.0 ± 10.9 years, 33.1% women, 25.1% non-White race) who underwent PCI. We observed graded, decreased antiplatelet adherence across income categories: rates of PDC≥80% decreased with successively lower income. Individuals with annual income <$40,000 had 1.5-fold higher odds of non-adherence (95% CI, 1.40–1.56) compared to those with income ≥$100,000 after multivariable adjustment. ConclusionsIn a claims-based analysis, we determined that lower income is associated with decreased likelihood of adherence to antiplatelet agents following PCI. Our results indicate the importance of considering social risk factors in the evaluation of barriers to antiplatelet adherence following PCI.