Abstract

A 9‐year database of sunlit E region electron density altitude profiles (Ne(z)) measured by the Sondrestrom incoherent scatter radar (ISR) has been partitioned over a parameter space of 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7) and solar zenith angle (χ) to investigate long‐term solar and thermospheric variability and to validate a contemporary EUV photoionization model. A two‐stage filter, which rejects Ne(z) profiles with large Hall‐to‐Pedersen conductance ratio and incorporates an MLT‐dependent correction factor for low‐energy precipitation, is used to mitigate auroral contamination. Resultant filtered mean sunlit Ne(z) is compared with subauroral Ne measured for the same F10.7 and χ conditions at the Millstone Hill ISR in order to confirm adequate high‐energy auroral rejection. Mean Ne, as expected, increases with solar activity and decreases with large χ. Radar model comparison indicates that across all parameter space and for altitudes from 105 to 180 km, the GLOW model estimates are within 5% of the ISR mean with the contribution from photoelectrons accounting for 30 to 50% of equilibrium ion density. Above 180 km, the GLOW model slightly overestimates the height of the F1 layer. Radar model comparison also reveals a low‐altitude Ne enhancement for high solar activity at altitudes commensurate with 3 to 7 nm XUV and H Lyman‐β radiances. The variance of the ISR mean Ne is shown to be greatest at low F10.7 (solar minimum). Simulated Ne variance envelopes, given by perturbing the GLOW model neutral atmosphere input by the measured Ap, F10.7, and Te extrema, are narrower than ISR derived geophysical variance envelopes at solar minimum. We find no evidence for solar cycle control of low‐energy precipitation and thus we attribute the observed Ne variance at solar minimum to variability in solar EUV flux. In order to address estimation of Ne at altitudes where GLOW model photochemical equilibrium assumptions are invalid, we provide an empirical model for Sondrestrom quiet time photoionization Ne(z) as a function of F10.7 and χ.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.