Abstract

It is increasingly common to judge the sustainable development of nations by non-declining social well-being. Determinants of social well-being have been measured and used for sustainability analysis. In particular, inclusive wealth per capita, which comprises produced, human, and natural capital, was reported in the Inclusive Wealth Report in 2012 and 2014. Here, we report the updates of the third edition of the report, which covers 140 countries from 1990 to 2014. In per capita terms, only 60% out of 140 countries show non-declining wealth for the past quarter century. Most countries, both developed and developing, fall into the group of running down natural capital and increasing produced and, to a lesser extent, human capital. We also include fishery stock as part of natural capital, and we find that only a few countries have increased their fishery capital in the studied period. Inclusive wealth has typically grown much less than GDP per capita and does not resemble change in other development indices. Globally aggregated produced and human capital per capita increased 94% and 28%, respectively, while natural capital per capita declined by 34%. In 2014, produced, human, and natural capital account for 24%, 64%, and 11%, respectively, which is similar to the recent findings by the World Bank. In addition, inclusive wealth is approximately 12 times GDP on average, much higher than conventional wealth-income ratios globally, and is at least at par with those ratios in high-income countries under financialization.

Highlights

  • Among a myriad of alternatives to gross domestic product (GDP) is a determinantbased approach that measures social well-being in terms of capital assets (Dasgupta 2001)

  • Have nations been maintaining their wealth for the past quarter century? Our results suggest that 95% of nations have enjoyed positive growth rates in inclusive wealth (IW) during this period

  • We briefly note that part of this rundown is traceable to international trade of natural resources, which is recorded as natural capital depletion of exporting countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among a myriad of alternatives to gross domestic product (GDP) is a determinantbased approach that measures social well-being in terms of capital assets (Dasgupta 2001). Development is deemed sustainable at a given time t, in the sense of Bruntland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987), if and only if the aggregate change in the value of produced, human, and natural capital assets increases at t based on their shadow prices (i.e., their contribution to social well-being). TFP signifies the overall efficiency of institutions and the knowledge with which the three types of capital assets are used. Applications of this determinant-based approach to sustainability measurement abound at varied scales and levels of rigor (Arrow et al 2012; Greasley et al 2014; World Bank 2011; Yamaguchi et al 2016). We propose some corrections and further discuss global wealth, the wealth-income ratio, and comparisons with the World Bank’s measurement of wealth

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call