Abstract

ABSTRACT Children with special education needs (SEN), such as children with autism, benefit from being included in education along with typical peers. However, development and implementation of inclusive education (IE) is considered difficult. This paper identifies conditions that facilitate IE development for children with autism in the European Union and benchmarks to track IE policy development. Education policy data from 30 legislative regions in the European Union were analyzed through a qualitative comparative analysis using eight conditions: a definition of SEN, the right to education for children with SEN, support for teaching staff, support services for children with SEN, individualized learning outcomes, parental involvement, and mixed mainstream classes. The right to education for children with SEN is implemented in all regions under study. Seven of the examined conditions were associated with IE: an established definition of SEN, support for teaching staff, support services for children with SEN, individualized learning outcomes, parental involvement, IE policies, and mixed mainstream classrooms. Mixed classrooms and support services for children with SEN were identified as necessary for IE. IE policies and support for teaching staff were present in all scenarios that facilitated IE. While the analysis was initially focused on autism, the policies consisted predominantly of general SEN policies, allowing the results to be interpreted in a wider context, beyond autism. Ultimately, mixed mainstream classrooms and support services for children with special needs were found essential for consistent IE development. Support for teaching staff and IE policies facilitate IE and should be further explored and implemented.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of special education needs (SEN) in children in the European Union (EU) varies between 1–20%, depending on the classification system (Banks & McCoy, 2011)

  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a mixed-method approach developed by Ragin (1987) and has been used to analyze compara­ tive case studies that include a medium number of cases (Schneider & Wagemann, 2012)

  • This study affirms that EU countries unanimously implemented the right to education for children with SEN and shows that seven of the examined factors are associated with an environment of inclusive education (IE) in the EU through the perspective of children with autism: an established definition of SEN, support for teaching staff, general availability of support services for children with SEN, individualized learning outcomes, parental involvement, IE policies, and mixed mainstream classrooms. This suggests that various inputs or components in an education system may be key in the development of IE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of special education needs (SEN) in children in the European Union (EU) varies between 1–20%, depending on the classification system (Banks & McCoy, 2011). The Council of Europe has associated segregation of children with SEN with lapsed learning opportunities that are worsened by isolation and lack of inclusion in mainstream education (Council of Europe, 2017). Attending mainstream education with SEN support would still not meet the Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211LK, Maastricht, child’s educational or social needs, or would inhibit the child’s welfare in any other way (UNESCO, 1994). For these children, segregated facilities are retained in order to ensure access to education

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.