Abstract

Accessible design within the built environment has often focused on mobility conditions and has recently widened to include mental health. Additionally, as one in seven are neurodivergent (including conditions such as ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and dyspraxia), this highlights a growing need for designing for ‘non-visible’ conditions in addition to mobility. Emphasised by the growing disability pay gap and the disability perception gap, people with disabilities are still facing discrimination and physical barriers within the workplace. This research aimed to identify key ways of reducing physical barriers faced by people with a disability and thus encourage more comfortable and productive use of workspaces for all. Once the need for designing for a spectrum of users and inclusive workspace design was understood, a survey was then circulated to students and staff at a large university in the UK (working remotely from home), with the aim of understanding how people have adapted their home spaces and what barriers they continue to face. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared to the literature read with key issues emerging, such as separating work and rest from spaces in bedrooms. The survey findings and literature were evaluated, extracting key performance-based goals (e.g., productivity and focus within a study space) and prescriptive design features (e.g., lighting, furniture, and thermal comfort), whilst also considering the inclusivity of these features. The key conclusion establishes that, to achieve maximum benefit, it is important to work with the users to understand specific needs and identify creative and inclusive solutions.

Highlights

  • The discussion regarding equality in the use of the built environment focused on physical access [1,2] as this has improved, the discussion has only just widened to address mental health and neurological conditions [3–5]

  • This paper aims to add to this discussion, by analysing existing research on the design of workspaces from an inclusive design perspective, focusing on non-mobility conditions

  • A key issue highlighted in research regarding the implementation of workspace adaptations is the dependence on goodwill and a dedicated senior leadership team [14,15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accepted: 9 March 2022To ensure the built environment contributes to an equal and inclusive society, we need to ensure our spaces are being designed to be accessible and inclusive. The discussion regarding equality in the use of the built environment focused on physical access [1,2] as this has improved, the discussion has only just widened to address mental health and neurological conditions [3–5]. Workspace adaptations for people with disabilities have often focused on physical adjustments for people with mobility-related conditions, such as implementing ramps and lifts. A key issue highlighted in research regarding the implementation of workspace adaptations is the dependence on goodwill and a dedicated senior leadership team [14,15]. This implies stricter inclusive regulations to improve the overall baseline. While studying autism is a large step in designing inclusively, we must consider a spectrum of conditions aligned to the term neurodivergence. Overall, improving the baseline in regulations and policy, by considering neurodivergence, can help to improve inclusive design

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.