Abstract
The inclusion of Indigenous people in universities is an important policy issue, as evidenced by the Review of Higher Education and Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which is currently underway. While the Review aims to collectively address access and outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in universities to ensure parity in the sector, a key contributor to those outcomes is that of participation. This article examines a focus group interaction in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students are yarning about their experiences of participating in university life, using Ethnomethodology (EM) and its analytic methods. Premised on the understanding that language is action, the study examines the students’ use of personal pronouns and particularly the first person pronoun ‘we’, using the inclusive/exclusive distinction. Applying this pronominal system here provides insights into the notion of inclusion/exclusion for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in Australian higher education, and for understanding how ‘we’ matter(s) in everyday university life.
Highlights
The inclusion of Indigenous people in universities is an important policy issue, as evidenced by the Review of Higher Education and Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which is currently underway
These performance indicators are determined by the Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), and are considered in relation to the indicator of equality between Indigenous and domestic students within Australia
This small scale study drew on EM’s analytic methods to explore an interaction in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students were discussing their experiences of everyday university life
Summary
The first Australian university began operations in the mid-1800s, it was not until the advent of mass higher education in the 1970s that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were given access to higher education institutions; in line with the social progressive ‘Australian discourse of the “fair go”’ (Augoustinos, Tuffin, & Rapley, 1999, p. 353). These performance indicators are determined by the Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), and are considered in relation to the indicator of equality between Indigenous and domestic students within Australia. These are 2.5% for the access and participation rates and 1.0% for the retention and success rates
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
