Abstract

To illuminate the processes of creating learning communities, this study investigated the social context of an inclusion classroom by examining (a) how teachers established a community ethos, (b) how students responded with regard to the positioning of students with disabilities, and (c) how macro discourses possibly shaped interactional processes. Teachers used discourse and participation frameworks in whole-class lessons to encourage participation and collective responsibility for “helping.” Nevertheless, the teachers’ inclusive language was manipulated to harass and exclude in small-group contexts. Benhabib’s conceptions of “general” and “concrete” selves and Cornelius and Herrenkohl’s aspects of classroom power—assigning ownership, creating alliances, engaging in persuasion—frame a discussion of contexts of inclusion and exclusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.