Abstract
The significant remapping of the rhetorical terrain within women’s rhetorical studies has created well-worn grooves toward the same destination: women participating in feminist endeavors in traditional, subtle, or surprising ways. Amid smart calls for and descriptions of expansiveness by feminist scholars, binary constructions of women as either feminist or not persist, perpetuating the practices we strive to dismantle and restricting possibilities for meaning-making, particularly with regard to conservative women who may not seek to empower themselves or others but still hold rhetorical sway. Employing Royster and Kirsch’s “ethics of hope and care” can bring opportunities for the field’s greater capaciousness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
