Abstract

AbstractAlbedo change during feedstock production can substantially alter the life cycle climate impact of bioenergy. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have compared the effects of albedo and greenhouse gases (GHGs) based on global warming potential (GWP). However, using GWP leads to unequal weighting of climate forcers that act on different timescales. In this study, albedo was included in the time‐dependent LCA, which accounts for the timing of emissions and their impacts. We employed field‐measured albedo and life cycle emissions data along with time‐dependent models of radiative transfer, biogenic carbon fluxes and nitrous oxide emissions from soil. Climate impacts were expressed as global mean surface temperature change over time (∆T) and as GWP. The bioenergy system analysed was heat and power production from short‐rotation willow grown on former fallow land in Sweden. We found a net cooling effect in terms of ∆T per hectare (−3.8 × 10–11 K in year 100) and GWP100 per MJ fuel (−12.2 g CO2e), as a result of soil carbon sequestration via high inputs of carbon from willow roots and litter. Albedo was higher under willow than fallow, contributing to the cooling effect and accounting for 34% of GWP100, 36% of ∆T in year 50 and 6% of ∆T in year 100. Albedo dominated the short‐term temperature response (10–20 years) but became, in relative terms, less important over time, owing to accumulation of soil carbon under sustained production and the longer perturbation lifetime of GHGs. The timing of impacts was explicit with ∆T, which improves the relevance of LCA results to climate targets. Our method can be used to quantify the first‐order radiative effect of albedo change on the global climate and relate it to the climate impact of GHG emissions in LCA of bioenergy, alternative energy sources or land uses.

Highlights

  • Biomass as a source of renewable energy can decrease dependency on fossil fuels and contribute to climate change mitigation by storing carbon in biomass and soil (Creutzig et al, 2015)

  • A 20% reduction in yields mainly affected the result of the willow scenario due to lower soil carbon sequestration (0.59 Mg C ha−1 year−1 on average during the study period, i.e. −30% compared with the baseline)

  • Using monthly radiative kernels from CAM3, ECHAM6, CAM6 and HadGEM2 to calculate radiative forcing (RF) from albedo change in the willow scenario resulted in 2%, 15%, 78% and 100% higher albedo RF on average over the cutting cycle, respectively, compared with the method used in this study with 5 day resolution (Table S13b)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Biomass as a source of renewable energy can decrease dependency on fossil fuels and contribute to climate change mitigation by storing carbon in biomass and soil (Creutzig et al, 2015). Specific objectives were (a) to include albedo in time-dependent LCA; and (b) to evaluate the magnitude of the life cycle climate impact due to albedo change and compare it with carbon sequestration and GHG emissions in a bioenergy system. For this purpose, LCA methodology was combined with time-dependent models of the production chain, biogenic carbon fluxes, nitrous oxide emissions from soil and radiative transfer. Studies have shown good potential of SRC willow bioenergy systems to generate low (Heller, Keoleian, & Volk, 2003) or negative emissions (Ericsson et al, 2013; Hammar, Hansson, & Sundberg, 2017; Hillier et al, 2009)

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| RESULTS
Fallow
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.