Incidental vs. clinical diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Population, treatment and outcome in a cohort of 828 patients followed at Instituto Oncológico Henry Moore (IOHM).

Abstract

e16075 Background: For the past three decades, it has been observed in developed countries an increase in the incidence of RCC, at the expense of small tumors incidentally found. This study compares the epidemiology, treatment and evolution of the patients (pt) with incidental RCC (Group A) or clinical RCC (Group B). Methods: Between 1/1/2001 and 11/30/2016, 29,440 new pt with histological diagnosis of cancer were incorporated to the IOHM database. We selected all those coded under the WHO ICD10 code C64. The medical records were reviewed, registering the epidemiological data, treatments and evolution of each patient Results: We identified 828 pt out of 29,940 pt (2.8%) who met the inclusion criteria. Group A = 507 pt (61%) and Group B = 321 pt (39%). The table below shows the characteristics of both groups. Conclusions: 1) In this cohort the incidental diagnosis of RCC represented 60% of the cases and correlated with early stages and less aggressive tumors. 2) The appropriate selection of patients allowed partial nephrectomies in 103/828 Pt. (12% of the cases). 3) With a median follow-up of 30 months the survival rate of this population exceeded 90% in the early stages and was close to 50% in advanced cases. [Table: see text]