Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience with the EOS machine in order to identify the incidence and clinical significance of incidental extraspinal findings (IESF) in an adult spinal deformity population.MethodsOur institutional database was queried for all full-length standing radiographs generated by the EOS machine. Dictations were reviewed and the number of incidental extraspinal findings were classified using a previously described system. All findings related to the spine were excluded. A subset of electronic medical records were reviewed to determine further workup for individual findings of suspected clinical significance.ResultsOriginal database query based on radiology reports returned a total of 1857 EOS studies. Duplicate studies, studies without the entire body, and patients with more than 1 study during the search period were excluded. 503 patient studies (55.5% female, mean age 59-years-old, range 18 to 91-years-old) met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of incidental extraspinal findings in our study was 60.4% (304 findings in 503 patients). Most findings were classified as Minor. The rate of Major and Moderate findings was 4.8%. The final rate of clinically significant incidental extraspinal findings was 0.8% and included 3 presumed metastatic lesions in long bones and 1 pulmonary nodule.ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first study that reports the rate of incidental extraspinal findings on full body EOS studies. We report a low rate (0.8%) of clinically significant incidental extraspinal findings which is lower than that of CT or MRI. Further research is warranted in comparing EOS and standard radiography.

Highlights

  • The evaluation of adult spinal deformity typically requires a full-length standing spine radiograph

  • After obtaining institutional IRB exemption, we retrospectively queried the database in order to identify all full-length, standing radiographs taken between October 2017 and September 2018

  • Clinical significance We reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of patients with 24 incidental extra-spinal findings (IESF) (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evaluation of adult spinal deformity typically requires a full-length standing spine radiograph. These images were obtained using traditional plate radiography with 36-inch films (Fig. 1a). EOS technology (“EOS imaging”, Paris, France) has allowed simultaneous capture of biplanar imaging in an upright position, to include the entire skeleton (Fig. 1b). This technology carries some advantages for the spinal deformity surgeon including accurate assessment of global spine and skeletal standing alignment, including an assessment of leg length and position. Disadvantages include investment and operating costs [2], including for sterEOS software, as well as potentially inferior resolution quality, as compared to standard radiography [7, 8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call