Incidence of erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia: the Prospective Immunogenicity Surveillance Registry (PRIMS)

Abstract

BackgroundSubcutaneous administration of Eprex® (epoetin alfa) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) was contraindicated in the European Union between 2002 and 2006 after increased reports of anti-erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). The Prospective Immunogenicity Surveillance Registry (PRIMS) was conducted to estimate the incidence of antibody-mediated PRCA with subcutaneous administration of a new coated-stopper syringe presentation of Eprex® and to compare this with the PRCA incidence with subcutaneous NeoRecormon® (epoetin beta) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa).MethodsPRIMS was a multicentre, multinational, non-interventional, parallel-group, immunogenicity surveillance registry. Adults with CKD receiving or about to initiate subcutaneous Eprex®, NeoRecormon® or Aranesp® for anaemia were enrolled and followed for up to 3 years. Unexplained loss or lack of effect (LOE), including suspected PRCA, was reported, with antibody testing for confirmation of PRCA.ResultsOf the 15 333 patients enrolled, 5948 received Eprex® (8377 patient-years) and 9356 received NeoRecormon®/Aranesp® (14 286 patient-years). No treatment data were available for 29 patients. Among 23 patients with LOE, five cases of PRCA were confirmed (Eprex®, n = 3; NeoRecormon®, n = 1; Aranesp®, n = 1). Based on exposed time, PRCA incidence was 35.8/100 000 patient-years (95% CI 7.4–104.7) for Eprex® versus 14.0/100 000 patient-years (95% CI 1.7–50.6) for NeoRecormon®/Aranesp®. The incidence of PRCA with Eprex® was not significantly different versus comparator ESAs (rate ratio: 2.56; 95% CI 0.43–15.31). An analysis based on observed time produced similar findings.ConclusionThis large, prospective registry demonstrates that PRCA is rare with subcutaneous administration of either the new coated-stopper syringe presentation of Eprex®, or NeoRecormon® or Aranesp®.