Abstract
PurposeWe aimed to determine the incidence of blepharoptosis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and compare the rates of blepharoptosis between patients injected with an eyelid speculum and those injected without a speculum. DesignRetrospective cohort study MethodsInternational Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) was used to identify patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and those who developed ptosis following intravitreal injections. Patients with nonexudative AMD who did not receive intravitreal injections served as control. The outcomes were the incidence of ptosis in the injection group compared to the non-injection group and incidence of ptosis in patients whose injections were performed with an eyelid speculum as compared to those whose injections were performed without specula. ResultsWe recruited 1,100 exudative AMD patients who received at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection and 2,258 nonexudative AMD patients who had not received an injection. In the injection group, 18 out of 1100 patients (1.6%) developed ptosis, compared to 52 out of 2258 patients (2.3%) in the non-injection group (p=0.25). Within the injection group, ptosis was mostly bilateral, diagnosed on average 22.4 months following the initial injection, and following more than a one-year injection-free period. 11 out of 537 patients (2.0%) injected without a speculum developed ptosis, compared to 8 out of 444 patients (1.8%) injected with a speculum (p= 0.82). ConclusionsNo statistically significant differences in incidence rates of ptosis were observed. In this analysis, neither intravitreal anti-VEGF injections nor speculum use during injections appears to increase the risk of ptosis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.