Abstract
II vs. no MB or type I MB.) Tissue heating of 21 to 40°C was associated with a lesser magnitude of impedance decrease, but excess tissue temperatures were noted across the spectrum of impedance decreases. Conclusion: Impedance monitoring during cooled-tip ablation is more useful than microbubble monitoring. A decrease 20 ohms heralds impending aggressive microbubble formation. Target tissue heating was associated with lesser, rather than greater, magnitudes of impedance decreases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
